Pull the owl onto the globe. This expression on social networks means to do something far-fetched, to manipulate facts in order to justify the correctness of one’s point of view, to try to fit desired result under poorly prepared facts. This is exactly what happened with the investigation into the murder of three Russian journalists in Africa in the summer of 2018, which was carried out by the Mikhail Khodorkovsky-funded Dossier project, which presented its results in closed regime for those especially close to them, and then they brought our liberal media to the people: Novaya Gazeta, Radio Liberty, Dozhd, The Bell and the like
By the way, who conducted the investigation, where the “documents” and data were obtained from, how reliable they are and who can confirm their authenticity. There is none of this, of course. Just referred to "source security". Divine, isn't it?
Let me remind you how it happened. On July 31, 2018, the media reported the death of three Russian journalists in the Central African Republic. They were Okhran Dzhemal, Alexander Rastorguev and Kirill Radchenko. The film crew arrived in this African country on the order of the Investigation Management Center, the media structure of Mikhail Khodorkovsky. The purpose of the trip is to search and visualize evidence of the presence of the Wagner PMC in this state and the affiliation of Yevgeny Prigozhin (as liberals call him “Putin’s cook”) in running his business projects in the CAR. The group arrived in this country without accreditation to conduct journalistic activities, but with about $10,000 in cash (an astronomical amount of money for this country) and expensive filming equipment. The journalists were to be met by a certain Martin, who supposedly understood the nuances of local nature and fauna and was supposed to provide support to the group in its work. The contacts of this same Martin, as the “investigators” now claim (I’ll call them that), were given to the editor-in-chief of Misha’s sharazhka by RIA FAN journalist Kirill Romanovsky, who had recently been on a business trip to this African republic. As you know, the media resource RIA FAN is associated with the same Yevgeny Prigozhin, and here the first question arises for the “investigators.” If you are planning to film incriminating evidence (let’s call a spade a spade) on Prigozhin, then what kind of idiot do you have to be to contact a journalist from his own publication asking for help? As I understand it, this was not done by accident, but so that later the name of the RIA FAN journalist could be used in the so-called. investigation as one of the evidence of Prigozhin’s involvement in the murder of Dzhemal’s group. Like they asked a journalist from RIA FAN to help, and he, a radish, knocked on the boss, the boss got scared and decided to remove the film crew so that they wouldn’t dig up anything incriminating. And if so, then it turns out that when sending Dzhemal’s group to Africa, Misha Khodorkovsky already knew what awaited them there and set snares in advance for his future “investigation”? After all, what prevented, logically, from turning to journalists from Western publications with a similar request? Firstly, it would be more reliable, and secondly, the secrecy of the trip from Prigozhin’s structures would be respected. So, this is question number one for the “investigators”. Let's move on.
Due to the postponement of the flight, Dzhemal’s group arrived in the CAR two days earlier than planned. Let's say. Accordingly, that same Martin could not meet them, since he was in another part of the country, but he sent them a driver named Bienvenu, and immediately the “investigators” say that this former employee gendarmerie of the Central African Republic...Well, they think so. Since when is the word “believed” evidence? I believe that the Americans did not go to the moon, well, that’s what I think, and I will never claim that this is true until I have PROOF. The driver could not be contacted upon arrival, and the group took a taxi to the hotel. In the evening, Bienvenu arrived and met with journalists. And here again the “investigators” make a wonderful conclusion - from the moment they arrived in the CAR, Dzhemal’s group was under the supervision of a local gendarme, to whom everything was reported by the same driver Bienvenu, who, as they CONSIDER, is also a former gendarme, and there were also THREE Europeans (Russians) , and now it’s absolutely stunning - they were all later at the scene of the murder of Dzhemal’s group! Oh, how!!! Why do we make such enchanting conclusions? This is practically an accusation of complicity in murder! And then they tell us...drum roll...they were presented with DOCUMENTS!...Show me quickly!!! It's a bomb! Prigozhin is the organizer of the murder!...And what do they tell us in response? Well....it's...like...we have the cell phone billings of these people and from them we figured out that they were communicating with each other...and also the stringers, whose names we of course will not name, interviewed local residents and they all gave testimony, what yes! Prigogine is to blame! Not even discussed!
Who are these stringers? Where are these interviews? Who are these locals? On what basis did you decide that the three Europeans are Russians and the phones belong to them and that they even existed in reality? Can you trust cell phone billing data and is it real and not photoshopped?
And then they show us a picture of cell phone billing. At first I thought that this was an official document from the cellular operator, but it turned out that it was not. But nevertheless they continued to convince me that this was the original. Don't go to a fortune teller. You will never be able to do this in Photoshop. I swear to my mom!
Just a second, guys. What should I understand from this picture, which, moreover, any Photoshop god can make in two hours? Is she really genuine? Seriously? Those. Do you think that the driver, what's his name, Bienvenu, constantly called the person who, as you again claim, is a member of the gendarmerie and who was not far from Dzhemal's group? Those. Are you implying that Bienvenu reported to this gendarme about the movement of the group? Let's turn the question around this way. You simply found a number, even if it was a gendarmerie employee, a real number, and then in Photoshop you made a printout of the billing where you inserted all the necessary numbers. What-what are you saying? That this gendarme was on a retraining course where he was trained by Russian specialists? Yes, he could even be on the moon! Where is the evidence that this man was even close to Dzhemal’s group, that he was at the scene of the murder, and that he coordinated his actions with the Russian “Wagenerites”, except for this primitive picture with the supposed billing of his cell phone and the interview that some then stringers whose names you cannot name and show these very interviews and documents of local residents too? I will make the same picture, insert Misha Khodorkovsky’s phone number there and then say that it was he who coordinated the murder. Do you even realize this is funny? Let me tell you how it was? You just took this poor driver's phone number. They took the phone number of a certain gendarme from social networks. Look, it’s really from social networks!
They even took his real biography, because our specialists really train local security forces, and no one hides this, then they made a funny photoshop with these two phones, like one called the other all the time. Nu-nu. Let's move on. What other evidence do you have?
Stringers again? What is it! Well? What are they saying? That on July 30, the evening before the murder, 20 minutes before a car with Dzhemal’s group passed at the exit from the town of Sibut in the direction of Dekoa, a jeep with five people in it drove in the same direction? Two African gendarmes and three Europeans, well, in the sense of employees of the Wagner PMC, as I understand it? Those. did they go to ambush? Who told the stringers this? The soldier who served at the checkpoint then? Oooh-ooh-ooh. Did you say it yourself? Did you just take it and tell them? Can you see how he says it? Can I look at him himself? Nizya? "For security reasons"? I understand... But he didn’t say who killed Kennedy? Is there life on Mars? It's a pity... It would have been such a bomb. They would raise money.
Where did you get the idea that the three Europeans are Wagner employees? How? Billing again? Photoshop again? Is the number definitely registered to the Russian instructor Alexander Sotov? No? And for whom? On the fake passport of US citizen Barrett Travis Hammond? How do you know that this is the number of a Russian military specialist working in the Central African Republic? Yes, I know he works there! This is open information! I ask why are you so sure that he still registered the left number on his American passport? Who said??? I don’t understand, please repeat! Anonymous source??? Mmmmm. Worthy proof, now everyone will definitely believe that the Russians did it.
Yes, guys. You definitely pulled the owl onto the globe. Moreover, the owl was small, but the globe was huge, and during the process of pulling it on, the owl tore.
I think everyone knows that in fact the murder of journalists was the result of a confluence of a number of actions that were unacceptable when working in one of the hottest spots on the planet. This is the lack of security, which they could easily afford, and disregard for the warning of the military at that very checkpoint, who did not want to first allow the car with Dzhemal’s group into the area controlled by the field commanders of the radical Muslim organization Seleka, and the lack of accreditation, and exposure of a large amount of cash and equipment. But the dead journalists made their worst mistake when they contacted Khodorkovsky. Exactly from that moment they were doomed.
Dmitry Borisenko, specially for News Front
While one triangle plows like a thousand Stephen King blacks, talking about games, I will talk not about triangles, but about... other technologies for creating images. I will be fast and merciless to the details - otherwise it will be matan, formulaic and boring.
Most modern indie developers use a ready-made engine and don’t bother at all with technologies for displaying images on the screen. This is progress and the twenty-first century, these are plots, mechanics, interactive cinema... but creators have little choice: 2-de pictures or 3-de scenes. The first option is built from pixels; the second option, I want to rhyme from voxels, but this is not about that, so the second is built from polygons, or rather from triangles, that is, from triangles.
Voxels are three pixels and do not have to be cubes. It’s just that if they are balls, they will not evenly fill the space, or they will begin to penetrate each other, and this is not convenient for us. Therefore, sometimes voxels are not only cubes, but also other three-dimensional figures.
There are also vector graphics for two screens. The first computers (which are not yet PCs) used it, but now it is SVG and flash which is still alive in some places.
All this is wonderful, but in modern PCs (set-top boxes and other boxes), all graphics are created by special GPU accelerators (including those integrated into the CPU processor), so even two des will be drawn on top of a pair of triangles folded into a square (square), which is stretched over the entire (and not really) a screen with a z coordinate equal to zero or simply a depth that is the same for all pixels.
The creators of soft renderers are trying in every possible way to make Kommersant graphics output, bypassing the video card pipeline. How true this turns out and whether the video card driver really translates their soft pixels without conversion is not interesting to us. What’s interesting is that soft renderers do all the transformations inside the processor and display the finished image on the screen. All operations: sprite layout, geometry transformation, texturing and post-processing, lighting with various light sources, shadows, etc., are all done by the CPU. The finished piece of CPU memory is sent to the memory side of the video card, from where the GPU carefully displays it on the screen point by point.
With two de, everything is simple - a lot of square pictures are copied onto the screen. They are square for people, but for a computer they are just a chain of sequential bytes. For tri-de we need to play a game of “project it”: the displays are still flat and 2D, but the stage is 3D. You need to project the “shadow” of the object onto a flat screen, preferably using all sorts of perspective corrections... and blah blah blah, but first you need to go even deeper. Attention! If not matan, then geometry and philosophy are already close!
We don’t need to explain why we need to explain three des on a flat screen, but somewhere in the wilds of the pitch - this three des scene is described in the form of triangles. Why triangle? Because it is a minimal figure with which you can cover or pave any surface. Anything at all. The circle can be tiled with triangles. Yes, in this case the circle will turn into a polygon, but the number of points on the display screen is still finite, therefore, the more triangles, the rounder the circle. Plus there are also various benefits from the geometry of triangles.
By the way, it is appropriate to remember here that any 3D scene is described as a surface. This is how we perceive the world around us - we feel the surfaces: with our hands, with sound, with our eyes. To see what's inside an object, you first need to disassemble it and only then look at new surfaces. There is also an x-ray, but there we see sections and complete the volume according to... blah blah blah. In the case of pictures on the screen, we are interested in “touching” the 3D surface with light. The rest of the physics of collisions of solid bodies and the sound of steps on carpet and tiles in a swimming pool is a separate topic for separate manuscripts.
So, we touch the triangles with rays of light and get some kind of picture. A little boy, having touched a book from the publishing house Mir about computer graphics, is puzzled: why should I draw all these triangles, making some kind of transformations, when it is easier to draw ready-made objects, as in pixel art. Here is a table and a chair, here is a ball, a cylinder, a cube, draw! And the boy is right, but (!) we have limited computing resources and we just simulate all these objects, repeating the nature of light reflected from real objects. And there is a ball, and Monte Carlo on the mountain with the princess, and along the road Mario is jumping on Yosha. Mathematicians have described all this. We ended up with integrals and in some places even triple ones, but we won’t do them. We will simplify.
When we simplified it, we got the first quake and a lot of triangles. There was also Wulfenstein and Doom and Hexen, but they were two-point-five. This is to be closer to the games. In fact, it's the other way around. A ray is emitted from each pixel of the screen, it collides with some triangle, and if it collides, we look to see if light is falling into this place. If it falls, we highlight this point. It's faster and less likely to miss. There is also a texture that is like a skin stretched over an object, this is beautiful and different materials.
To give graphics programmers control over this whole process, they came up with shaders - programs in the GPU that transform one triangle into another, or simply something geometric into something else geometric, or draw a pixel. Yeah! This is almost what the boy asked for, but the shader program does not draw the whole table and chair, but just one point. But this is already something, because from dots we can draw a table, a chair, pixel art, and even an owl on the table, and then the globe is just a stone’s throw away.
There are many processors inside the video card and they work in parallel. Let everyone do the same thing that a couple of cores of a regular processor do in a softrender. It’s better to let each micropercent of the video card work on one pixel of the final image, but then let it do all the operations. So, like in pixel art: we put a point - we see the result.
Points are good, but we have triangles there, and the more triangles, the more collisions with rays we need to count; the fewer triangles, the less round the ball, and the owl gradually curls into a cylinder. If earlier they thought it was simple: a beam of light collided - it was light, flew past - it was dark, but now they have turned up a cool trick like physically accurate rendering (PBR) and the efficiency has sagged. Well, maybe we can just draw a chair right away?
And they drew it, but the effect still sank. To be continued... or bury it if not necessary...
There is a popular Runet expression: “pulling an owl onto a globe.” It means difficult actions associated with extreme manipulation, manipulation, and adjustment of reality to some semi-fantastic settings.
We can do it! - said the magicians from the Primorsky Election Commission and did the impossible. Truly a man-made miracle. Victory in the gubernatorial elections of the candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation Andrei Ishchenko, a 7-8 percent gap between him and the candidate from " United Russia"Andrei Tarasenko, at the cost of mind-blowing efforts, turned in a few hours into the leadership (one and a half percent) of Tarasenko.
"Apparently, according to the protocols, the number of votes for Tarasenko has increased“- a representative of the regional election commission told RIA Novosti with a disarming smile. It turns out that in all the latest counted protocols, the checkboxes are placed exclusively opposite the name of the United Russia member. Have you pulled the poor bird onto a three-dimensional model of the Earth?
"The second round of gubernatorial elections in Primorye ended in scandal. Almost the entire day, according to the Central Election Commission, the candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Andrei Ishchenko, was in the lead. A new regional sensation was discussed in the media and social networks, and political scientists commented on the causes and consequences of Ishchenko’s victory, but after a few hours the results were changed in a strange way. In the interval from 98.77% to 99.03% of processed protocols, the number of votes for Ishchenko decreased by 5 thousand, which is impossible in principle, and for Tarasenko - increased by 13.5 thousand, which allowed United Russia to win the elections. This change in results provoked a storm of discussions about stuffing, falsification and rewriting of the final protocols“- notes the portal “Current Comments” (pro-Kremlin, by the way).
"The somersault that was made is purely mathematically impossible. This is the biggest fraud in Russia", - noted Alexander Glebov, deputy of the Duma of the city of Vladivostok. " Judging by how the results changed, data manipulation was carried out at the stage of entering data into the State Automated System “Elections” database. This is done in TECs, which is why the changes were so large-scale. Rewriting protocols at individual PECs would not have had such an impact on the situation", says Mikhail Karyagin, editor-in-chief of the site "Topical Comments." You wanted arguments against direct elections of regional heads? Presented. In full. Nothing has changed for twenty-five years. And it won't change. It is much more honest and cleaner to empower heads of regional parliaments", wrote Alexey Chesnakov, director of the Center for Political Conjuncture, in his Telegram channel. " Is Tarasenko really such a valuable personnel that it is possible to discredit the electoral system in such a way?"- asks political strategist Abbas Gallyamov on Facebook.
Business developer Andrei Ishchenko was congratulated on his confident victory by his party chief Gennady Zyuganov, Primorsky ex-governor Evgeny Nazdratenko, deputy of the Legislative Assembly of the Primorsky Territory Yulia Tolmacheva and many others... At 7:40 am (0.40 Moscow time) Ishchenko went on an indefinite hunger strike. " Late tonight, when 95.74% of the ballots were processed, I was in the lead by a significant margin; in the morning, the magic of numbers predicts failure for me. Friends, our votes are being stolen. The regional election commission is treacherously and brazenly trying to steal our victory. I won this election! I am declaring an indefinite hunger strike in the square of fighters for Soviet power in Vladivostok. At the moment, the legal service of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is preparing lawsuits to challenge the election results in Artyom, Ussuriysk, Nakhodka and Vladivostok (Sovetsky district). We have a complete evidence base for this“- he wrote. Hundreds of Ishchenko’s supporters came to the administration building of the Primorsky Territory. Motorists passing along Svetlanskaya Street greeted the crowd with horns.
Earlier, firefighters arrived at the building of the election commission of the Sovetsky district of Vladivostok. They explained their actions with information about a fire on the third floor and the need to evacuate. Upon closer examination, it turned out that the arrival of firefighters was caused by the refusal of observers from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation to leave the site. At the same time, the police cordoned off the building of the TEC of the Ussuri urban district. State Duma deputy Yuri Afonin and legislative assembly member Anatoly Dolgachev tried to enter it, but they were not allowed into the room due to a “broken lock.”
"This is lawlessness not only in relation to the Primorsky Territory, it is lawlessness in relation to the entire country, the entire political system and even in relation to the country’s leadership" - says State Duma deputy, press secretary of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation Alexander Yushchenko. He told Interfax about mass falsifications in Ussuriysk: " For polling station 2846, we have a copy of the protocol, where there are 219 votes for Ishchenko, 247 for Tarasenko, but at the moment the numbers are entered into the GAS “Elections”: 216 for Ishchenko, 1347 for Tarasenko. The chairman of precinct 2866 fled and took all the documents with him. We were not given a copy of the protocol, our members of the election commission are locked in one room and cannot move; they called additional police officers, but no one came". Deputy Chairman of the Primorye Legislative Assembly Committee on Regional Policy and Legality Artyom Samsonov told the portal dvnovosti.ru that the results at 22 PECs in the Ussuri urban district were falsified. The results for 10 of these polling stations, according to him, were changed after the protocols were entered into the State Automated System "Elections" system.
United Russia responded by accusing the Communist Party of bribing voters. " It became known that at least 13 thousand people were bought in Vladivostok, 6 thousand people in Nakhodka, about 5 thousand in Khasan. According to our data, people were driven to the sites by car and money was immediately distributed. They paid from 500 to 2 thousand rubles for a voice", a representative of Andrei Tarasenko's headquarters told TASS. " We have reliable information, which we are now making official. The fact that the headquarters of the candidate of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation spent about 40 million rubles on bringing voters. There are audio and video recordings, as well as photographs, to confirm this.“- First Deputy Secretary of the regional branch of United Russia, Igor Khrushchev, told reporters.
According to the chairman of the Public Chamber of the Primorsky Territory, Boris Stupnitsky, observers did not record any violations during the second round.
The Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation will not summarize the results of the second round of gubernatorial elections in Primorye. " Until we thoroughly analyze all the complaints that are received, we will not sum up the results.", Ella Pamfilova, head of the Central Election Commission, told a TASS correspondent.In an interview with RIA Novosti, she admitted the possibility of canceling the results of the Primorye elections.The CEC will send specialists to the Primorsky Territory to obtain additional information.
Ishchenko told journalist Taisiya Bekbulatova about Zyuganov’s night call to Pamfilova. She allegedly complained that she could not influence the situation, that the regional election commission "rebelled and out of her control".
I don’t feel any sympathy for Mr. Ishchenko (a swindler, a scammer of shareholders, an irresponsible balabol-populist, as Vladivostok residents say). I hate democratic performances; I believe that governors should be appointed by the federal center. But once you decide to play direct elections, play smart.
The internal political bloc of the AP and local authorities first framed the President of the Russian Federation, completely failing election campaign Kremlin candidate. And they set us up doubly when they organized such a clumsy and shameful interference in the vote counting at the very finish line. Let's be cynical: there are plenty of ways to turn failure to your advantage without fanfare. There are various levers, quiet, delicate methods. To put together a rolling disgrace like today's - you have to be smart about it.
“My tongue is my friend,” this is how the famous proverb can be paraphrased. Because, in fact, our language, in most cases, gives us the opportunity to conduct a relevant and unbiased examination. Which will be devoid of any propaganda frenzy. There is no great desire to write a large article on this issue, therefore, as they say: “let’s go over the top.
The mention of the toponym “Rus” in historical sources (mainly Byzantine) was initially associated directly with one city - Kiev. And one could even say it was synonymous with its name. In one of my previous investigations, I even put forward a theory that Russia itself was called Samvatas, the High Castle, an impregnable rock on the path of the Turkic tribes - the main fortress of Kyiv. But this is not important, it is important that Kiev was called Rus, and Kyiv was called Rus.
But the borders of Kyiv did not end with the borders of its fortress - Rus'. The borders of Kyiv extended as far as he could “cover” them, conquer them, protect them, and defend them. Most likely, this is where the word “Edge” came from, which means Slavic languages, both: country, homeland, homeland, and: part, piece, segment, end of something. And most importantly: “the land.”
The toponym “Ukraine” was first mentioned in the Kyiv Chronicle (according to the Ipatiev list). year 1187. In the episode about the death of the Pereyaslavl prince Vladimir Glebovich, then in the Galicia-Volyn Chronicle under 1213, 1280 and 1282. In all cases, the mention of a toponym necessarily applies exclusively to the territory of Rus' - Kyiv. The toponyms Rus' and Ukraine were never used in relation to Novgorod, Polotsk, and even more so to Moscow. One might even say that Rus' and Ukraine have become synonymous. As a rule, Rus' began to be called Ukraine at the time it became part of the federation of Slavic countries - the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Russia. Mentions of Rus'-Ukraine can be found in documents of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania of the 15th-16th centuries. Thus, in a letter dated 1500 to the Crimean Khan Mengli-Gray Grand Duke Lithuanian calls “our Ukraine”: Kyiv, Volyn and Podolsk lands. That is, the Lithuanian prince, to paraphrase, calls the historical regions of Rus'-Ukraine “our lands”! That is why the privilege of 1539 for the construction of a castle in Kiev Polesie we're talking about about the usefulness of building such castles “in Ukraine” - “on earth”.
In 1580, in the universal of King Stefan Batory it is written: “To the elders, sub-elders, lords, princes, lords, Ritsersky people in the Russian Ukraine: Kyiv, Volyn, Podlyash, Braslav procrastinating.” That is, Stefan Batory directly points out that “Ukraine” is called Rus', or all the Russian possessions of the Polish crown, and not only new ones, but also old ones.
In the mourning poem of 1585 for the death of the Kyiv castellan, Prince Mikhail Vishnevetsky, the Kiev region is called “Dnieper Ukraine” or, translated in a modern manner, “Dnieper land”. In 1621, Kiev, Bratslav, Volyn and Podolsk were considered Ukraine - the lands that suffered from the Tatars. That is, Greater Rus' Ukraine was represented by separate Ukrainian lands: Bratslav, Kyiv, Dnieper, Zadneprovsk and so on.
Hetman Vygovsky demanded the concession of “the right to all ancient Ukraine or Roxolania ... up to the Vistula,” and declared his desire to become the “Grand Duke of Ukraine,” meaning “all Ukraine” - “all Russian Land.” And lastly, to prove the theory that “Ukraine” is exactly “land”. After the Truce of Andrusovo in 1667, which divided Ukraine along the Dnieper, the term “Little Russian Ukraine” appeared in everyday life, which can only mean one thing: “Little Russian land.”
Let me remind you that many countries are called “lands” or in English/German “land”: England - “Land of the Angles” and Germany - “Deutschland” - “Deutsche Land”. And the word “land” itself is translated similarly to Ukraine - country, land, region, allotment, region. So, if you are historically literate, then Ukraine should be called “Rus Ukraine” - “Land of Rus'”!
So limitless that our “well-wishers” do this every day.
Recently tape.sru gave birth to another maxim: Polish globes with Russian Crimea were withdrawn from sale in Belarus. To this madness lekar1971
noticed that:
Firstly, thousands of similar globes, on which #Crimeaisours, were imported into the country. Apparently, Putin’s Polish agents worked tirelessly.
Secondly, they heard something about the confiscation of globes only in Mogilev.
Thirdly, the whole movement was started in Mogilev by one zmagar, whose hyperactivity syndrome had worsened the day before and he was running around the city and scaring Belpochta kiosks with scary paper, demanding to remove the non-kosher Polish printing product from the counter. He distributed reports of his epic victories via the Internet, thanks to which the story became famous.
Stories about the globe are still very petty and primitive.
Therefore, the lampoons are getting wider and thicker:
—
"Russian Spring""begins for health:
Belarus is not going to question or revise the union agreements with the Russian Federation.
And then it is not at all clear from what hangover he continues for the repose:
A number of statements by President Alexander Lukashenko or high-ranking Belarusian officials are often interpreted in Russia as unfriendly, if not treasonous. In this regard, there is a need to develop mechanisms to ensure consistency foreign policy RF and RB.
And then, instead of analytics, it’s just spit:
Whether or not there is a Russian-Belarusian union in reality, just like whether there is life on Mars, is a controversial question.
http://rusvesna.su/recent_opinions/1465571542
— "Century" he simply turns into a neurasthenic schizophrenic when it comes to Belarus:
For some reason, official Minsk considered that with a certain development of events, the “Russian Spring” could happen in Belarus.
— But most of all I was “pleased” "Free press".
What is one headline worth:"A stiletto in the back of Moscow."
And then, under these headings, Mr. Ishchenko’s rantings on the topic “Kyiv is celebrating: a joint Ukrainian-Belarusian air defense system will allow you to shoot down Russian planes"
. Moreover, all these experiential rantings are based solely on the fact that "
Sensational photographs of a railway train (with an MZKT chassis) that arrived in this country from Belarus without much publicity appeared in the Ukrainian media.".
Firstly, no one showed any echelon, but just some photo of several platforms from out of nowhere.
Secondly, if "without much publicity", then no "Ukrainian media" not a word would be said.
And thirdly, since when did the Ukrainian Ishchenko, who found refuge in Russia, begin to believe "Ukrainian media" ?
But if you overcome yourself and read the entire text, it becomes clear that Mr. Ishchenko, who so hated the Ukrainian oligarchs, is now very willingly licking the ass of the Russian ones: "The Russian side is not averse to radically solving the problem: simply take and completely buy out a controlling stake in the Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant"
But alas: “As it turned out, Moscow has been negotiating this topic with its allies for years. Without results. Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev spoke about this openly and with obvious resentment in April of this year".
And therefore (and only for this reason!) Mr. Ishchenko reports his (or rather, Russian-oligarchic) summary: “a certain aftertaste from such an alliance, you see, cannot help but remain”.
Here Mr. Ishchenko is very modest: Russian (and other) oligarchs have more than just a sediment. They begin to have fits when they see that property in the Republic of Belarus does not belong to them, but to the state (the people).
P.S.
Why is there such a sharp aggravation among all these SMI people and expErds now? —
you ask.
And everything is very simple: on June 22-23, the fifth All-Belarusian People's Assembly will be held in Minsk, at which the Program of Socio-Economic Development of the Republic of Belarus for 2016 - 2020 will be adopted
Gentlemen SMISHNIKI, expErds and other political fools know very well that
and therefore they suck everything they can out of their dirty fingers, just so as not to show the truth about us.
Loading...
